It is easier to see the flaws in others if we have first glimpsed them in our own mirror. I'm not quite ready to totally cop to "arrogance" here in my seventh decade. Yet there have been more than a few periods in the past when "quite self-confident" and "very assured" would have been shoes that fit. I recall a particular "devil may care" description in a performance evaluation. I regret those times and the hurt that the guy I was then may have caused to others. But, realistically, the damage he did was usually limited to those who least deserved it; friends and family, sometimes students or colleagues. My occasional arrogance though, bruised only those in my relatively small circle of influence.
When arrogance plays out on the world stage the damage it does touches us all. History sadly provides reams of examples. Hitler, Stalin, Pot Pol, Napoleon and Idi Amin, spring to my Western male mind. They were despotic, arrogant rulers who killed millions who, they felt, stood in the way of their "superior vision" of how the world should be. I'd add the guy responsible for the ancient and widespread global practice of slavery, and the attempted genocide of the native inhabitants of the US, but I don't think there is a single individual who could shoulder blame for those cultural dark times and the vile practices of the species.
When looking back to those more specific individuals, we have a tendency to take a healthy swig of schadenfreude, and sigh "Thank god, I wasn't alive then!" But we might want to pause a moment and consider the reflections of arrogance we could glimpse in the mirror of the world today. It is those creeping visions of arrogance that make me ignore the "front pages" of my morning news feeds and scroll swiftly to the "arts and leisure" sections of today's online news outlets. Yet, almost escaping my glancing notice is the fact that much of that front page contemporary arrogant chaos is being fomented by a particular demographic subset - old white guys.
Let us take journalism's old mantra of "if it bleeds it leads" as our guide and take a look at a couple of today's aging arrogant warriors: Vladimir Putin, 72; and Benjamin Netanyahu, 75.
We shouldn't really be surprised at Putin. He was, after all, in the KGB for 16 years and served as head of Russia's version of the CIA. That resume doesn't lead one to expect a "kinder and gentler" version of Russian foreign policy. Putin obviously believes that the "proper version" of Russia includes huge chunks of Ukraine. And if he has to borrow a few pages from Stalin's murderous playbook to make it happen, so be it.
Netanyahu also carries his own "tough guy" credentials having served in the Israeli Defense Forces and Sayeret Matkal special forces. He arrogantly makes no secret of the fact that "Hamas started it!" and that it still advocates the total destruction of Israel. True. But where is the wisdom, forget compassion, in subjecting your enemy - and civilians caught in the middle - to the same, deadly and immoral treatments which you endured?
But maybe there is a bit of schadenfreude lurking in my choice to deal with Ukraine and Gaza first. I mean those places are really, really far away. It's not as though some aging arrogant politician is beating up my country or the rest of the world with self-serving actions.
Oh, wait. Enter Donald Trump, 79.
Unlike Putin and Netanyahu, Trump has no military background - a deferment based on heel spurs and various other conditions allowed him to avoid that dangerous arena. However, he is well-trained in his weapons of choice: political and financial pressure and/or executive orders. Wielding these tools Trump has swiftly confronted those he deems "standing in the way of his 'great' vision of how the world should be." Universities, international trading partners, cultural venues, domestic manufacturers, international political allies, poor and middle class citizens, professional football teams, legal immigrants, and former political and legal adversaries; all have felt the sting of the President's mercurial and unpredictable proclamations. And while, seemingly, no actual bodies lie dead on his political battlefields, the security and predictability of millions of lives around the globe have been thrust into uncertainty.
What is it with these old white guys? Well, as one of them at 76, I can hazard a guess or two. Despite the ability to click around and find a website that would paint each of them with the brush of dementia, I think other more intentional motivations are at play. First, I think it has to do with the whole business of legacy. We all want to be remembered, hopefully in a good way. The arrogant angry three have found themselves, for some reason or another, on the mediated center of the world stage. So unlike the rest of us septuagenarians - who are mostly concerned about the perceptions of friends, family and colleagues - the big three realize, and probably delight in, the fact that the whole world is watching. So they bluster and preen.
Secondly, they are bullies who have always demanded that it was "my way, or the highway!" or "You're fired!" Two have history in military organizations that simply killed those who disagreed with their view of the world. The third destroyed opposition just a touch more subtly with the unvarnished application of political and financial power.
It strikes me that much of the damage done by these three aging "arrogantists," to create a word, is the result of a predominantly patriarchal cultural process that values and rewards the acquisition and application of power. So what's a guy or gal to do? According to an old quote (the source of which is much debated) "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." Ignoring for a moment the omission of at least half the species, that exhortation is a bit shy on what the implied "something" we should be doing actually is. Or, more clearly, what can each of us do to prevent the rise of, and the damage caused by, arrogant old men?
My stage is hardly the world, and smaller still since leaving the classroom. Nonetheless, I will leave you (yes, I know, again.) with the assertions that my seven decades prompt me to advocate:
"Foster harmony, enable beauty, distill complexity, and oppose harm."
I cannot help but believe that even just a little bit of that mantra, every day, in whatever we do, an effort from all of us can make the world a better, more compassionate - less arrogant - place.